Run T-0102 rejected

· Evidence: SPRT Sequential probability ratio test. Games are played until the accumulated evidence reaches one of two bounds; then the test stops.

Hypothesis

A failed hash allocation is caught and resolved by using a smaller table instead of terminating the search thread.

Wording edited for publication from the German entry; the register carries the author’s own text.

Stages

Elo against the predecessorElo intervals: short stage +0.45 ± 4.08.−4−20+2+4short stage+0.45 ± 4.08short stage · rejected+0.45 ± 4.08 Elo · 8,522 games
Point estimate with the reported 95-percent half-width, per stage. The dashed line is zero. Estimates from a stopped sequential test are biased by the stopping rule; the interval is nominal.
Field short stage
Verdictrejected
Elo Strength difference to the opponent, estimated from the games, with a 95-percent half-width where the oracle reported one. Never an absolute rating.+0.45 ± 4.08
nElo Normalised Elo: the Elo difference divided by the spread of the game results, so that the SPRT bounds mean the same at different time controls.+0.81 ± 7.38
Games8,522
Wins / draws / losses2,294 / 3,945 / 2,283
pentanomial Games are played in pairs with swapped colours; the five counts are the pairs scoring 0, ½, 1, 1½ and 2 points.108 / 864 / 2305 / 877 / 107
LLR Log-likelihood ratio, the running evidence of an SPRT. It starts at 0; a stage passes at the upper bound and fails at the lower one.−2.96
Bounds−2.94 … +2.94
SPRT Sequential probability ratio test. Games are played until the accumulated evidence reaches one of two bounds; then the test stops.[0.0, 10.0]
Error rates α / β0.05 / 0.05
Modelnormalized
time control Base time plus increment per move in seconds, e.g. 8+0.08: eight seconds per game plus 0.08 seconds per move.8+0.08
BookA
Opponentvs predecessor
Duration1 h 04 min

Provenance

Date
2026-09-21
Started
2026-09-21 20:30:00 UTC
Duration
1 h 04 min
Author
Agent X
Epoch
5
Gatekeeper
passed
Bench nodes
3,627